10/4/2008 1
The Curve in the Road
Necessary but Not Sufficient
Why the Government Had to Step In
All the King’s Horses
How Can I Be 59?
By John Mauldin
The “Bailout Plan” was passed. Will it work? The answer depends on what your
definition of “work” is. If by work you mean no more government intervention and no
further costly programs and a functioning market, then the answer is no. But there are
things it will do. This week I try to help you see what might lie ahead around the Curve in
the Road. We look at how the rescue plan will function, see what is happening in the
economy, and finally muse as to whether Muddle Through is really in our future. It will
make for an interesting, if not very upbeat, letter, so strap in. I would like your promise to
not shoot the messenger. I am just trying to give you some of my thoughts as to what may
lie in our future. And remember, as you read this, we will get through it. There are better
days “a’coming.”
But first, a few housekeeping items. Let me welcome some 200,000 new readers
from EQUITIES Magazine. I have recently joined EQUITIES Magazine as a regular
contributing editor. My column, Back to the Frontline, is featured in both their print
publication and at equitiesmagazine.com. I am excited to be associated with this
esteemed magazine with a rich history covering the global markets for over 57 years.
They’ve once again agreed to offer any reader of mine a free subscription to
EQUITIES Magazine. For those who did not take advantage of the free subscription the
first time, here is your chance. You can go to
http://www.equitiesmagazine.com/mwi
and simply register to get the magazine sent to your home or office. There is also a link to
an interview I did in April with them. They have a lot of content and free resources like
“live” real-time stock quotes and “live” real-time portfolio managers. Check it out!
Second, a quick commercial. There are managers who are successfully navigating
these markets. If you would like to learn more about who they are and how you can put
them to work for you, my partners would be delighted to introduce them to you. If you
are an accredited investor (generally, net worth of more than $1.5 million), please go to
www.accreditedinvestor.ws
, register there, and my partners in the US (Altegris
Investments) or London (Absolute Return Partners) will show you various alternative
investments like hedge funds and commodity funds which might help diversify your
portfolio. You really should see what is available behind curtain #3.
And for those with not quite that amount of net worth, I work with CMG in
Philadelphia. They have developed a platform of money managers who can take direct
accounts, and I recommend that readers interested in outside money management take a
look at them. If you would like to talk with Steve Blumenthal and his team about the
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 2
managers on the platform, simply click on the following link, fill out the form, and they
will call you.
http://www.cmgfunds.net/public/mauldin_questionnaire.asp
.
(In this regard I am president and a registered representative of Millennium Wave
Securities, LLC, member FINRA. And please read all the risk disclosures.) And now,
let’s jump in to the letter.
The Curve in the Road
When you are out driving on a strange new road, you can’t see around the curve
ahead. But you can read the warning signs to get an idea of what might be coming. And
while we can’t really know how the developments in the economic world will actually
unfold, there are some signs we can point to that might give us a few ideas.
First, let’s look at the “rescue plan” as passed by Congress. As I pointed out last
week, this is a bad bill. But it was necessary to pass something, and soon. Earlier this
week I sent out a report that reviewed a study of 42 major baking crises. The conclusion:
navigating them successfully depended upon quick action.
As everyone should know, the credit markets are almost completely frozen.
LIBOR is bid only, no offers. Commercial paper markets are imploding. And what is
trading is often at rates that are much higher than they were a few months ago.
Corporations are being strangled on high rates. Corporations have little or no access to
normal credit markets, and they will face massive problems when it comes time for them
to roll over short-term debt.
LIBOR has gone crazy. This is not an orderly market.
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 3
Look at the following chart from friend Greg Weldon. For most readers, the
commercial paper market is something you don’t think about. But it is the lifeblood of
business. We have seen this market drop by almost 30% in a year and by 10% in just the
last three weeks! I simply cannot overstate how serious this is. Left unchecked, business
activity in the US would soon slow enough to bring thoughts of the Great Depression. It
will not be left unchecked.
The credit crisis is not simply a Wall Street issue. It has fast become a Main Street
issue. And Main Street is where jobs are created and maintained.
As I have said repeatedly for months, the problem is that financial institutions are
having to deleverage. They have massive losses and simply have to raise capital in order
to survive. If you can’t raise equity capital (and most can’t), one of the ways you do that
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 4
is to make fewer loans and to take less risk. You also charge more for the loans you do
make.
Larger institutions cannot raise capital on competitive terms. GE is an AAA-rated
company. Yet they had to pay Warren Buffett 10% to get $5 billion, plus in-the-money
warrants worth at least another 10%. Buffett is likely to double his money on this deal
over 4-5 years. A short while ago, GE could get short-term commercial paper for a few
percentage points. That difference is going to significantly impact GE’s bottom line. But
they had no real choice. They took the money.
As did Goldman Sachs. Yet another Buffett $5 billion preferred-share purchase
(with more warrants) at a rate that even Goldman will find it hard to make money on. But
they had to raise capital quickly, and they had little choice.
I had lunch with Michael Lewitt and Joe Harch yesterday. They were in town to
meet with a client, and we took the opportunity to get together and share notes. They run
(among other things) a collateralized loan obligation fund. They buy bank and corporate
debt. They now have the opportunity buy well-collateralized loans from rated companies
at prices well below par. They related story after story of debt from quality, highly rated
companies selling below $.90 on the dollar, and some much lower.
If GE and Goldman are paying 10%, what do you think it costs a firm with “only”
a B rating? 15%? More? Junk bond yields have simply gone ballistic. Firms which used
the credit market to access capital now are simply shut out. If they are a small public
company, they can go to what are known as PIPE hedge funds (Private Investment in
Public Equity) and sell equity at usurious rates (which is what Buffett does but on a larger
scale). But a small or medium-sized private company? It is a hard time to go looking for
money.
Left alone for the markets to work out, the economy of the US and the world
would be in a depression within two quarters and would need years to recover. Think
Japan.
Necessary but Not Sufficient
Now for the bad news. The Rescue Plan was necessary but not sufficient to fix the
crisis. There is going to have to be more heavy lifting, I am afraid. Let me offer a few
ideas about what possible actions might be taken in the future. I am not advocating these
actions, I am simply telling you what might happen. These are possible, because
authorities will do whatever they deem necessary to avoid a systemic economic
meltdown and a potential depression.
If you are a large investor or sovereign wealth fund which put money into banks
last year, you are down anywhere from 35-50% (unless you invested in Washington
Mutual, and then you are down 100%). You are unlikely to invest more in any financial
institution without some very real understanding of what is on the balance sheet of the
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 5
bank that is asking for your money. What the Paulson plan potentially does do is remove
the questionable debt. The bank may have to write down assets in order to sell the debt to
the government, but they end up with a transparent balance sheet with hopefully known
risks. Then they can go to the market and try and raise capital. Shareholders will get
diluted. Such is the way of the world.
Sidebar: taxpayers really must demand that someone like Bill Gross of PIMCO
and/or other savvy market specialists run this new government operation. He offered to
do it, and I think we should take him up on his offer. Taxpayer losses should be kept to a
minimum, and I believe someone like Gross would do his best to see that would be the
case. The point of this exercise is to restart the frozen credit markets, NOT to bail out
banks. Some banks may get bailed out in the process, but it should be at a cost to their
shareholders and management, not to the taxpayer.
I am asked, why can’t private money solve the problem? Because there is simply
not enough private money. Buffett offered to take 1% of the new government pool. If that
is all the largest pile of free money in the world can take, why does anyone think there is
enough private capital to take the other 99%? Insuring the mortgage bonds is not
sufficient, because there is not enough money to buy them in this market. When things
have sorted themselves out in a few years, I think the bonds can be insured and sold, and
likely at a profit if bought correctly. But we do not have the luxury of waiting a few
years.
Between the relaxation of the mark-to-market rules and removing ambiguously
priced loans from financial institutions at prices which allow the government pool to
make a small profit, if held for five years, that part (the lack of a known price) of the
problem can be solved. Banks can hopefully buy themselves time in which to work their
way out of the problems they created.
It is much like 1982, when every major US bank thought it was a good idea to
loan lots of money to Latin American countries. It was a most profitable business, right
up until the countries decided to default. Then every US bank was more than just
technically bankrupt. In a mark-to-market world, every large US bank would have
collapsed. It would have been the end of the world as we knew it.
What did they do? The Fed let the banks keep the loans on their books at face
value. Over time, they worked their way through the debt, making enough money to be
able to write down the loans. That was done simply to give the banks the ability to buy
time.
We are in a very similar situation. We have to buy some time in order for
financial institutions to heal.
Why the Government Had to Step In
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 6
I had a lot of readers write me very nice letters this week, starting out with how
much they like my letter, my insights, etc. Then they (mostly – but not all – and politely)
launched on me for backing the rescue plan. Many of you had much better ideas than
what was passed by Congress, which is not surprising.
I really do hate the idea of having to support a rescue plan. It goes against my
every instinct. But I also know that doing nothing would result in an economy which
would blow right through 10% unemployment within a few quarters, and take years to
recover. The stock markets and the savings of millions of retirees would be wiped out.
Home values would really go into a tailspin. Being right in theory is not worth seeing that
kind of devastation.
Herbert Hoover sat by and decided to let the market solve the problems of 1929.
He decided to run budget surpluses and ignore collapsing institutions. Combined with
disastrous Federal Reserve policy (raising rates in a recession) and Smoot Hawley (which
caused major trade wars and a slowdown in global trade), what should have been a
serious recession turned into the Great Depression and resulted in the conditions for
World War II.
The rescue plan does not address the need for the increased levels of capital
needed by banks. As noted above, it simply creates the conditions under which capital
might be raised. Banks have already raised $440 billion. They have written down $590
billion. Losses are estimated from a mere $1 trillion to as much as $2 trillion. About half
of those losses would be in banking institutions worldwide. That means anywhere from
$200 to $400 billion more must be raised in order for banks to get back to capital
adequacy. It is probably closer to the latter number.
Until banks are adequately capitalized, they are not going to be able to do normal
business lending. Further, large deposits are fleeing banks. Even with the new level of
$250,000 of FDIC insurance, there is $1.9 trillion in uninsured deposits. These are mostly
deposits of small to large businesses and financial institutions, which can leave a bank at
the push of a button.
Nouriel Roubini tells us that there are 800 billion dollars deposited in US banks
by foreign counterparties. Up until this week, if you were a foreign operation, would you
rather be in large money-center US banks or European banks? Tough choice, but on
balance you would pick the US. Then this week Ireland decided to simply insure every
deposit in Irish banks, no matter the size. Predictably, money started flowing from all
over Europe into Ireland. National banks and finance ministers are furious with Ireland.
However, Ireland may have no choice but to backstop its own depository
institutions to keep them from losing deposits and becoming insolvent from a bank run by
corporations acting in their own best interests. Belgium, The Netherlands, and
Luxembourg each took 49% of their respective parts of Fortis Bank in return for a
massive injection of capital, declaring the bank too big to fail – also wiping out a lot of
already diminished shareholder equity. Europe has its own quite serious problems.
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 7
But what if the various countries, one by one, decide to guarantee deposits in
order to protect their own banks? If you are an international corporation, especially if you
are outside the US, do you want your $10 million in Europe or the US if Europe
guarantees your deposits with no limit? Could we see silent runs on US banks?
I think it is about an even chance that the government will have to guarantee for a
period of time (say 6 months to a year) every bank deposit, regardless of size, in the US.
That is a staggering thought. The potential will be large for almost-insolvent
banks to pursue risky behavior to try and work their way through problems. If such a
policy is pursued, tight controls must be administered so risky banks do not offer high
CD rates in order to garner assets. The FDIC must closely monitor such activity. Perhaps
such guarantees should be for existing depositors and not new customers. Insolvent banks
and those on the edge must be shut down quickly in such an event, to prevent risky
behavior.
Unthinkable? I bet you there is a working committee of government and Fed
officials thinking about just that very thing and how to do it. It would be even more scary
if there is not one. We are in completely uncharted waters, and every contingency needs
to be thought through well in advance. We simply don’t need more last-minute Paulson
plans.
In the next few weeks and months, I think you can count on more extraordinary
actions by the Fed and Treasury to try and jump-start the credit markets. Actions which
were highly improbable a few months ago will be on the table. Will the Fed open its
balance sheet to non-banks? Possibly. If they can guarantee money markets, will there be
a scheme to insure commercial paper at some price? Not out of the question. Will
European governments take more equity in large European banks? Very likely. Will the
Fed and/or the Treasury invest even more capital in larger financial institutions? Given
that We the People now own 80% of AIG and 100% of Fannie and Freddie, it is certainly
within the realm of possibility that we will be the proud owners of even more private
institutions.
Again, this is not just a US issue. We will likely see similar actions in Europe and
some of the developing world. This is a worldwide crisis, and the response will be from
central banks all over the world.
Understand, I am not advocating these actions. I am simply trying to help you
understand what actions might be put into place by the various government of the world
in an effort to avoid systemic economic collapse.
All The King’s Horses
The reality is that the rescue plan does not fundamentally alter the US economic
landscape. There can be no doubt we are in a recession. I think it will be dated from the
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 8
beginning of the year, notwithstanding the odd 2
nd
quarter growth. The manufacturing
ISM was a dismal 43.5 (under 50 means a contracting US manufacturing industry). Such
a level is typically associated with recessions, as the chart below shows. Given the
financial crisis and the freefall in auto sales, this index is likely to fall further.
The “good news” is that the service portion of the economy is right at 50, which
means that at least that important area is not contracting.
Unemployment rose by 159,000, with nearly every sector affected. Almost
1,000,000 jobs have disappeared over the last 12 months, and it is likely that we will lose
another 1,000,000 jobs in the coming year. Since December, the ranks of the unemployed
have grown by 1.8 million, and those not in the labor force but wanting a job by 370,000.
Almost 3/4 of the increase in the unemployed have been job losers, with half the increase
from permanent job losers (not temporary layoffs). (The Liscio Report)
Next week we will explore the economic landscape in detail, but let me provide a
few thoughts. As I have said for a long time, we will be talking about deflation this time
next year. Recessions are by definition deflationary events. Given that we have had two
bubbles burst (housing and credit), there is even more potential for deflationary pressures.
Add into the mix the deleveraging process, which will take years to finally abate, and the
recent bout of price inflation caused by energy and food will pass, as demand destruction
for oil will hold oil prices in check.
As I have said for a long time, the next move of the Fed is likely to be a cut. We
are now close to such an action. A 1% Fed funds rate is again a real possibility. I am not
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 9
sure it will help as much as some market participants think, but I think it likely the Fed
will move before the end of the year, if not much sooner.
Europe and Japan are also probably in recession, and it is likely we are going to
see a worldwide global slowdown. It would be nice if the European Central Bank, the
Bank of England, and the Fed could coordinate a joint rate cut to signal that they are
working together on the problems. I would not want to be short the markets that day.
At the beginning of the year, I was predicting a small recession with a lengthy and
slow recovery period. I now think that the recession could be deeper than a 1%
contraction. I think we could see a rather lengthy recession. Quite simply, the credit crisis
has been allowed to spin out of control. That Congress almost failed to act is beyond
belief. Given the above circumstances, it is not out of the realm of possibility that a
recession lasts through the middle of 2009. As recessions go, that is a long time. But trust
me on this, it will pass. The recovery will be a slow Muddle Through affair, though. It
will be a few years before we are growing at a sustained 3%. Over the next few weeks,
we will look at what that means for earnings and the stock markets. Investors who utilize
a traditional 60% stocks, 40% bonds portfolio are not going to be pleased. We will look
at alternatives.
Stay tuned.
How Can I Be 59?
This has been a particularly hard letter to write, as I know it is rather gloomy, and
I wish had more encouraging news. I have been writing this letter for over eight years.
Every letter since the beginning of 2001 is in the archives, so my record is open for
inspection. I have no particular axe to grind. Since I basically help investors (in
conjunction with my partners) find investment managers and funds, we can adjust the
choice of funds and management ideas to suit the times, and frequently do make changes
in the mix. My goal in this letter is to help us all think about the economy and our
investments and to be as “right” as I possibly can. Sometimes, like today, that means not
being very upbeat. But it also means looking for ways to go with the tide rather than
against it. I actually hope I am wrong and the bulls are right. But that is not the way I see
it tonight.
Tomorrow is my birthday. The years seem to roll by at an ever accelerating pace.
(I had the reason this happens explained to me once. When you are 10, a year is 10% of
your life. When you are (sigh) 59, it is 1.6% of your life. It makes some sense.) It is hard
to believe I am 59. Maybe it is because I am around my kids so much, but I don’t feel that
old. Seven kids from 31 to 14 (plus assorted spouses and their friends) can do that. And
they are all coming to town to celebrate next weekend, so tomorrow will be a quiet day.
And Tiffani is already planning for a serious 60
th
birthday weekend next year.
Life has been good to me, for all its ups and downs. And I firmly believe that my
best years are ahead of me. I am simply having more fun than at any time in my life, with
The Curve in the Road
10/4/2008 10
more opportunities than I know what to do with. I am blessed with great business
partners. I have the best readers of any analyst anywhere. One million closest friends. I
am truly one of the world’s wealthiest men when it comes to friends and family, and at
the end of the day that is what counts.
Thanks for being part of my life. I plan on writing for a long time, so take care of
yourself so you can keep reading. And have a great week!
Your actually optimistic analyst,
John Mauldin
