The Rules Suddenly Change For Obama

By MICHAEL BARONE | Posted Friday, April 18, 2008 4:30 PM PT

Barack Obama seemed puzzled. Angrily puzzled. The apostle of hope seemed flummoxed by the audacity of the question.

At last Wednesday’s Philadelphia debate, George Stephanopoulos, longtime aide to Democratic politicians, was asking about his longtime association with Weather Underground bomber William Ayers.

The Weather Underground attacked the Pentagon, the Capitol and other public buildings; Ayers was quoted in The New York Times on Sept. 11, 2001, as saying, “I don’t regret setting bombs; I feel we didn’t do enough.”

It was at Ayers’ house that Obama’s state Senate candidacy was launched in 1995; Obama continued to serve on a nonprofit board with Ayers after the Times article appeared.

Obamaites live-blogging the debate were outraged. The press is not supposed to ask such questions. They are supposed to invite the candidates to expatiate on how generous their health care plans are. Or to allow them to proclaim that “we are the change that we are seeking.” Or to once again bash George W. Bush.

There was some of that in this debate. But Obama was asked about his association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, his remarks about wearing an American flag lapel pin, his comment that “bitter” small-town Pennsylvanians “cling to guns and religion,” and his “friendly” relations — “friendly” is his campaign adviser David Axelrod’s word — with William Ayers.

Did Obama expect that this would never come up in the campaign? He certainly gave that impression. The normally poised candidate looked irritated and weary.

“This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English” — actually, it’s education — “in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.

“And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was eight years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense, George.”

He compared Ayers to Sen. Tom Coburn, who has advocated the death penalty for abortionists. But of course, Coburn has never advocated bombing their houses or clinics.

“A guy who lives in my neighborhood.” Debates are held not just to learn the details of the candidates’ health care plans — which given the complexity of the issue probably will be considerably altered if they are ever actually put on the table — but also to learn who the candidates are. That includes learning about which guys who live in their neighborhood they chose to befriend.

About Obama, almost all Americans knew next to nothing when he got up on the podium of the 2004 Democratic National Convention and instantly made himself presidential candidate material.

His gracefully written, autobiographical “Dreams From My Father” — we could learn, if we could get through all 464 pages — is a story not of transcending racial barriers but of developing a black and African identity.

The presidency is a uniquely personal office, and each incumbent puts his individual stamp on it. Obama’s choice to join the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church and his choice to befriend William Ayers were not those most Americans would make, and Hillary Clinton was quick to declare, perhaps opportunistically, that they were not choices she would have made.

This doesn’t mean that Obama is responsible for Wright’s outrageous statements or for Ayers’ criminal acts (the charges against him were dropped because of government misconduct).

But Obama’s choices to associate with Wright and Ayers tend to undercut his appealing message — very appealing after 15 years of Bill Clinton and George W. Bush — that we must strive to overcome the racial and cultural and ideological divisions which have dominated our politics They are something that voters are entitled to weigh as they make their decisions.

Obama fans are upset that ABC News’ Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson broke the unwritten rule that you are not supposed to ask Democratic candidates about these things. Associations with unrepentant radicals and comments made to contributors at a San Francisco fundraiser in a billionaire’s mansion are supposed to be kept indoors. Only the face that the candidate wants to place before the public should be seen.

Beliefs that most activist liberals share should be kept under wraps if they are unpopular with most of the voting public. That is how mainstream media have operated for the past generation or more. But not at Philadelphia’s Constitution Center on April 16.

The rules had changed. Barack Obama was not well prepared.

Copyright 2008 Creators Syndicate, Inc


2 responses to “The Rules Suddenly Change For Obama

  1. Change to attack mode against Obama
    45 minutes of moderator questions backed by Hillary’s piling on and Obama,s defensive responses – while softballing Hillary
    1) Rev Wright controversy put to sleep a few weeks ago based on national polling. Why media revives it ??/
    2) clinging to religion – a valid question – even though people with little hope often cling to religion for hope.
    3) Ayers/weatherman of no natl interest – very tenuous association with Obama. Hillary associations past and present in or out of jail much more troublesome
    4) Flag pin – questioning patriotism – insulting to Obama ,the moderators ,ABC and the American people.
    45 minutes – with Hillary piling on shamelessly

    No serious questions to Hillary. For Example
    1)110mm$ candidate Living in mansions in Ark.,D.C. and NYC
    calling Obama an elitist.??/
    2) NAFTA – Bill created Hillary supported for 10+yrs until campaign started. No public record against it before the campaign Bills $800,000 payoff from Colombia – NAFTA interests into joint acct and tax return. Campaign mgr. Penn
    working for Colombia/NAFTA and Hillary at same time???
    demoted not fired and Wolfsons previous Columbia ties ???
    3)When asked the last time she fired a gun or went to church she refused to answer ???? Why ????
    4)Wont order Bill to open up donor list of Foundation/Library. How many paybacks/payoffs ala Denise Rich are hidden there????? Why isn’t the media all over this
    5) Foreign Affairs expertise – she base it on Ireland and Bosnia .What about Ireland -Mr Trimble called her a cheerleader. Th moderators asked about Bosnia she gave a weak non-answer and Obama didnt attack. – nor did the moderators continue the attack

    Tomas de Torquemada would have been proud of the handling of Obama

  2. Addendum
    Another question that could have been aske to Hillary

    Would she run the country with the sam sill that she has run her failed health plan and her presidential campaign.?

    I believe these are the only examples of her executive skill

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s