Tag Archives: muslims

Muslim Policies on Democracy in the West by Mohammad Nazeeh (Toronto, ON) – Facebook

I wanted to continue the conversation we were having regarding voting to bring it in a slightly different direction. As you all know, the muslim brotherhood released a memorandum in 1992 I believe stating that we needed to destroy the west from within so that we could establish Islam as the dominant religion. The words are below taken from an islamophobic webpage lol just for fun so you coudl see how pathetic they are. Islamophobes, ha what racists.

eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all religions.

Anywho, I see voting as the perfect way to do this. For those of you who do not, let us say we become 60% of a population through our birthrate inshallah. Now, we get to that point and then what? Do we consider to live under kafir law? do we continue to get robbed because the punishment is light?

For those who do not vote- what do you suggest we do when we are in a position of power and can place an Islamic government in power. We could form OUR own party and just vote them out.

Anti-2nd Amendment Lobby Rebuffed

Setting aside the fact that restrictions on the 2nd Amendment, among others (such as the first, fourth and fifth) will not hold in a conservative American court, the anti-2nd Amendment lobby’s argument [that guns are an intrinsic threat to society] is belied by conditions in Britain, arguably one of the most properly socialized places in all of Europe in that knife crime is a pervasive phenomenon there, especially in Muslim communities which are de facto segregated from the rest of white Britain. This anti-social barrier is reinforced by heavy criminal elements in said Muslim communities where non-Muslims (mostly people who aren’t Arab – e.g., whites) fear to tread. Thus, xenophobic sentiment is palpable in modern Britain.

But guns do not cause this anti-social barrier between people or even put the society at more risk. Arguably, if conceal carry permits were available, there would be less violent incidents (by principle of deterrence).  

The argument, therefore, that guns are inherently anti-social is belied by the aforementioned facts. If people would like to compare American liberties against the rest of the world, they should at least try and find out, to understand what is going on in other parts of the world. If they did, [liberals who argue in a vacuum] would not be given a free pass on their straw men fallacies.