Tag Archives: women

The DNC’s 1/2 Compromise (FL & MI)

The DNC’s argument cum [tentative?] decision to grant Florida and Michigan a proportion of their votes (e.g., half) based on the logic that people who don’t follow prescribed guidelines will only be partially represented in the electorate sounds eerily familiar. Oh yes, of course, it parallels the one granting blacks three-fifths of a vote and women none in the US Constitution.  

To that point, the Democrats’ fractures are systemic, in my opinion. I’ve made the following argument in many forums using iterations of the same theme – namely, that enfranchising dependents polarizes the political process.

The irony of the Democrats’ plight is that the veracity of this aforementioned premise is reflected by their virtually irreconcilable present state. That the ‘party of inclusion’ must change its tune in order to maintain order amidst chaos belies the reality behind feel-good rhetoric of anarchy cum despotism of the present left, which masquerades as the party of opportunity meanwhile locking away the skeletons in its own collective closet (e.g., Truman, the only POTUS with a Ph.D., instituted a policy of state-run racial segregation, FDR quarantined Japanese and Italians in prison camps because he felt their loyalty [to America] during a time of war was circumspect due to their race, David Duke and his cronies are Democrats, etc.). That the Democrats use the logic of our founders to reject complete and universal enfranchisement, which contradicts the premise that standards should not apply for enfranchisement – i.e., that it should be a universal right rather than a limited privilege.


Why Female Chauvinism Is Worse Than Male Chauvinism

At the heart of female chauvinism or simply, feminism, lies disrespect for male authority whereas male chauvinism is something referred to by women as cruelty, which is in fact supported not only biblically and historically, but across the world in terms of social norms. Feminists defy male authority and incite social instability by lechery and guile.

Sarah, Abraham’s wife lied straight-faced to God. In addition, Job’s wife told him to commit suicide when he was in his darkest hour.

At the end of the day every man knows he can only rely on himself and that marriage is largely a relationship of convenience; that relationships with women are largely relationships of convenience. God says that it is not good for man to be alone so he made woman. Then the apostle Paul said it is better for man to be without a woman if he can stand it. However, that it is better for a man to be married than to burn with lust.

Feminists (your typical woman) make life as difficult for [white] masculinity as God says it would be for a rich man to enter heaven. These terms are metaphorical of course, but it truly is a daunting task being a man in the present age (unless one is not white, then a swagger is par for the course).

The reason female chauvinism (feminism) is worse than what is referred to as male chauvinism by jealous and contemptible women is underscored by the conditions of our present age. The baby boom generation, which takes great pains to diminish white masculinity, prefers to sacrifice national security on the altar of political correctness. The vacuum left by an absence of white masculinity invites barbarism to supplant order, leading to the ghettoization of our society.

As in Deuteronomy 28, curses for disobedience,
“The LORD will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth.”

[…] You will be unsuccessful in everything you do; day after day you will be oppressed and robbed, with no one to rescue you.

[…] You will be pledged to be married to a woman, but another will take her and ravish her. […] Your sons and daughters will be given to another nation, and you will wear out your eyes watching for them day after day, powerless to lift a hand. 33 A people that you do not know will eat what your land and labor produce, and you will have nothing but cruel oppression all your days. 34 The sights you see will drive you mad.

[…] The LORD will drive you and the king you set over you to a nation unknown to you or your fathers. There you will worship other gods, gods of wood and stone. You will become a thing of horror and an object of scorn and ridicule to all the nations where the LORD will drive you.

[…] You will sow much seed in the field but you will harvest little, because locusts will devour it. […] You will have sons and daughters but you will not keep them, because they will go into captivity.

[…] The alien who lives among you will rise above you higher and higher, but you will sink lower and lower. 44 He will lend to you, but you will not lend to him. He will be the head, but you will be the tail.

All these curses will come upon you. They will pursue you and overtake you until you are destroyed, because you did not obey the LORD your God and observe the commands and decrees he gave you. 46 They will be a sign and a wonder to you and your descendants forever. 47 Because you did not serve the LORD your God joyfully and gladly in the time of prosperity, 48 therefore in hunger and thirst, in nakedness and dire poverty, you will serve the enemies the LORD sends against you. He will put an iron yoke on your neck until he has destroyed you.”

Feminists dissent against reality to impose upon the whole of society their vision for self-empowerment which objectifies themselves and nullifies objectively based natural law and absolute morality. The black and female ’empowerment/liberation’ movement[s], which heretofore have been coterminous as well as symbiotic, are simply anti-Christian, anti-white-heterosexual-male, anti-Capitalist and anti-democratic fascist radical particularist movements with views toward toppling traditionalist (white christian male patriarchal democratic capitalist) order. What these movements aim to do will land America and other nations overrun by these ideologues into a Third World ghetto.